<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VW Picks Up the Tab with Carbon Offsets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alternativeconsumer.com/2007/09/05/vw-picks-up-the-tab-with-carbon-offsets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alternativeconsumer.com/2007/09/05/vw-picks-up-the-tab-with-carbon-offsets/</link>
	<description>The Alternative Consumer provides product reviews, eco news and green info to the next wave of smart consumers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:18:15 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean O</title>
		<link>http://www.alternativeconsumer.com/2007/09/05/vw-picks-up-the-tab-with-carbon-offsets/comment-page-1/#comment-29306</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 05:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alternativeconsumer.com/2007/09/05/vw-picks-up-the-tab-with-carbon-offsets/#comment-29306</guid>
		<description>I write about this a lot on my site that covers global warming (http://www.globalwarming-factorfiction.com) and I am typically very skeptical of carbon trading schemes.

P.T. Barnum supposedly said that there was a sucker born every minute. Sometimes, when I read about carbon credits, I am not sure who the sucker is - the person buying, the person selling, or the general public for thinking it is helping!

In order for credits to be feasible and to be more than a “feel good” gesture, we need solid accounting, accountability, and penalties. We have none of that now and this article makes this painfully clear. We cannot allow credits to be used for minor contributions to a project. The credit must go to the cost of reducing the greenhouse gas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I write about this a lot on my site that covers global warming (<a href="http://www.globalwarming-factorfiction.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.globalwarming-factorfiction.com</a>) and I am typically very skeptical of carbon trading schemes.</p>
<p>P.T. Barnum supposedly said that there was a sucker born every minute. Sometimes, when I read about carbon credits, I am not sure who the sucker is &#8211; the person buying, the person selling, or the general public for thinking it is helping!</p>
<p>In order for credits to be feasible and to be more than a “feel good” gesture, we need solid accounting, accountability, and penalties. We have none of that now and this article makes this painfully clear. We cannot allow credits to be used for minor contributions to a project. The credit must go to the cost of reducing the greenhouse gas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
